"Polarization " Work of Venezuelan painter Ender Cepeda .
The "quality" of something depends on what you want to do with that. If you are going to be in a luxurious holiday, perhaps the best glass quality is a glass of fine crystal. But if you're on the beach or an excursion to Avila, the glass "thinner" will surely be rather a plastic, to hold without breaking the ravages of the road. The quality of something is NOT a condition of the object itself, but a consequence of their suitability for use. In other words, no object is "good" or "bad" in itself: It depends on what it wants one.
The same goes for politicians, specifically with elected officials. What if the candidate "of the Revolution" are good, average, bad or very bad? What if the candidate "of Democratic Unity" are excellent or are a disaster? Look, it depends on what you want. Would be foolish to believe at this point that there are only good people (or just bad people) in a particular party. As also would be a mistake to assume that better or worse quality of a public servant is something that comes with the color of the shirt, or the party card.
"THE REVOLUTION IS HERE TO STAY"
Rather, the key issue of quality of politicians become public officials (governors, mayors, deputies, etc..) Can be in this sentence, President Chavez often repeat frequently: "This revolution is here to stay." Obviously, no politician comes to power it to go as fast as you can! And this has to do only with the desire to perpetuate Third in command. It's actually a universal phenomenon, as in the case of the concept of "quality" has been examined in depth by experts in the functioning of organizations: any bureaucracy (read well, ALL, whatever it is ...) is first objective, as the main mission, sometimes as only real purpose, to perpetuate itself. applied this principle to politics, then we with political parties, movements or "revolutions" born with a very nice speech, denouncing promising one thing and another. But once they get into power they forget all that and the only thing pending is what to do to bolt on power. This happened before, so it is now, and those who read us know we are telling the truth about the size of a house ...
The same happens when we speak not of the bureaucracy in general, but officials in particular: The first thing you think a governor, a mayor or a congressman when he comes at last to the position he has been looking for, is as able to stay in him as much time as possible, and uses it to continue "to above. " And there we key point: That official will do anything to maintain and improve the relationship with the factor that put him in power. There must be a "genius" in political science to understand: No governor, mayor or deputy who will fight to put "the good."
The same goes for politicians, specifically with elected officials. What if the candidate "of the Revolution" are good, average, bad or very bad? What if the candidate "of Democratic Unity" are excellent or are a disaster? Look, it depends on what you want. Would be foolish to believe at this point that there are only good people (or just bad people) in a particular party. As also would be a mistake to assume that better or worse quality of a public servant is something that comes with the color of the shirt, or the party card.
"THE REVOLUTION IS HERE TO STAY"
Rather, the key issue of quality of politicians become public officials (governors, mayors, deputies, etc..) Can be in this sentence, President Chavez often repeat frequently: "This revolution is here to stay." Obviously, no politician comes to power it to go as fast as you can! And this has to do only with the desire to perpetuate Third in command. It's actually a universal phenomenon, as in the case of the concept of "quality" has been examined in depth by experts in the functioning of organizations: any bureaucracy (read well, ALL, whatever it is ...) is first objective, as the main mission, sometimes as only real purpose, to perpetuate itself. applied this principle to politics, then we with political parties, movements or "revolutions" born with a very nice speech, denouncing promising one thing and another. But once they get into power they forget all that and the only thing pending is what to do to bolt on power. This happened before, so it is now, and those who read us know we are telling the truth about the size of a house ...
The same happens when we speak not of the bureaucracy in general, but officials in particular: The first thing you think a governor, a mayor or a congressman when he comes at last to the position he has been looking for, is as able to stay in him as much time as possible, and uses it to continue "to above. " And there we key point: That official will do anything to maintain and improve the relationship with the factor that put him in power. There must be a "genius" in political science to understand: No governor, mayor or deputy who will fight to put "the good."
CAN NOT BE WITH GOD AND THE DEVIL ...
The issue then is that the quality of public officials depends on who ultimately is his loyalty: If a red-rojito deputy knows he is none, that his name not known anyone that his face does not recognize anyone, and that is where it is simply because Chavez put it there, Who do you think will be the deputy at the time of a pod, when investigating a stew or punish an arbitrary? How the people Chavez, with the people in general, the poor, with the leg on the floor, or the almighty finger him out of anonymity and guamazo one put it "where"? That's why so much has happened while the current deputies serious look at those monkeys that neither see nor hear, nor say anything. That's why we did not see or the mega stew with the new building Pérez Hospital Lion of Petare, and the scandal of lost fortune in the electrical system but we are between blackouts, or smelled the 120 thousand kilos of rotten food in containers PDVAL. "Mapurite know who pee" say in the field. And they are right.
The same reasoning works, but in reverse, with the members of the "Democratic Unity" leaving elected on 26 September. These gentlemen, whoever they are, know that if elected will it beat out the machinery and the state money through the support of the people. They know they owe their position (ie: they owe their political life) not the party which may or bud, but resteó people to them, even under open handicap. These Members will want, like the "Rojitas" remain in their jobs and move up the policy. But unlike his fellow members of the PSUV, the opposition deputies who want to strengthen and enhance its position as politicians can not solve it, "jalándole" more and better to a "commander" No, sir! The opposition MP who wants to "stay and come" have to "take the rest", working with and for the people who elected him. That's why we'll see claiming that Barrio Adentro is closed, or claiming that the food does not Houses comes to food, or that the elderly do not pay them their pensions should be, or any other of the myriad things that can and should make a deputy, beyond meeting and raise your hand.
THE GOOD, THE BAD AND THE UGLY
As shown, red-rojito Members will be "bad" (beyond their personal, of his intelligence or character) because they simply are not there to be "good." They will be in the Assembly to do the same thing they have done in the past five years their pay, raise their hands when ordered and "made fools" when the government is appropriate. Feo, the piece of paper that will continue to play play. Instead, the deputies of the Democratic Unity should be good (again, regardless of their personal characteristics) because they simply have no choice: O strengthen its support base working for people, or take them down the middle of Red machinery.
In either case, citizens will be here, vigilant, social control to one another. For the times of bureaucratic impunity are over.
0 comments:
Post a Comment